
Greetings All,
President Obama has frequently stated that a cornerstone value of the public square in America is the value of tolerance. Mr. Obama has frequently acknowledged that both sides of a debate ought be given due hearing and respect, and when the issue of human life is at stake, a particular level of respect for the conservative view is called for. If the conservative view is incorrect, then the cost of the error is another human life developed out of the womb, possibly with a life of some hardship arising out of a difficult early life. If the liberal view is incorrect, then a silent holocaust is being conducted in this country on the order of millions. Whatever prevailing view of the times, the age and civilization-transcending maxim, "thou shalt not kill" will be our judge.
I recognize that the latter view does not now enjoy popular affirmation, nor sanctity in the systems of U.S. jurisprudence, but I beg you to recognize that many intelligent, well-reasoned individuals hold this view. I myself graduated from the University of California, Irvine, Summa Cum Laude, was a U.S. Fulbright Fellow in Vienna, Austria (2005/6), am currently completing my M.A. in philosophy from Boston College, and am headed to Loyola Law School in August. During my tenure as a Fulbright fellow, I had the privilege of studying the works of holocaust survivor and great psychiatrist Viktor Frankl. During the reign of the Nazi regime, Viktor and Tilly Frankl were forced to have an abortion. Eventually Dr. Frankl lost most of his family (including his wife) in the death camps, and was himself a prisoner for four years.
I am convinced that the current rescission proposal would be an ethical disaster for this country on an order of the magnitude of a government forcing a married couple to abort their own child. Forcing hospitals and doctors and their staff to participate in a practice that they believe is murder would forever compromise their ability to practice ethically. Alternatively, many hospitals would shut their doors to avoid such action, and some of our brightest and most ethical talent would abrogate the medical profession in a time when America is already experiencing a crisis of talent in the sciences. Removing the right to exercise one's conscience is like removing the portion of the brain that makes us most human. Only humans have the capacity to act responsibly, and when the government attempts to supersede or hijack this capacity, we are in grave danger of building a sub-human society.
Please retain the conscience regulation, and enforce current laws protecting the right of health care providers to serve patients without violating their moral and religious convictions. The right of conscience protected by existing federal laws is inviolable. Weakening protection for this right will harm the ethical integrity of our healing professions, drive caring people out of these professions, and reduce patients' access to much-needed basic health care.
Our time is a time of tremendous gravity unaware. When historians investigate the early events that eventually lead to cultural disintegration, it is often these types of subtle but crucial decisions that prevent or initiate a culture's embarking on an unfortunate path. As a legislator in a representative democracy, you have the power and responsibility to govern with your fiat and veto. I earnestly beseech you not to change your own views, but to retain the right for health care providers to live by theirs, particularly in such an ethically contentious arena as the ethics of early human life.
Sincerely,
David Hallowell
